Diagnosis and management of a metastatic mixed gestational trophoblastic neoplasia with synchronous primary lung cancer

  1. Varun Iyengar 1 , 2,
  2. Hetal Mistry 1 , 3,
  3. Catherine Hibbitt 3 and
  4. Alexei Shimanovsky 1 , 3
  1. 1 Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
  2. 2 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  3. 3 Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Varun Iyengar; viyengar14@gmail.com

Publication history

Accepted:06 May 2021
First published:26 May 2021
Online issue publication:26 May 2021

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

Mixed gestational trophoblastic neoplasias (GTNs) are rare placental tumours that arise from abnormal fertilisation events. To date, only 34 patients with mixed GTNs have been reported in the literature. As such, the management of such cases remains challenging. This report presents a case of a mixed GTN that was further complicated by a synchronous primary lung adenocarcinoma. Our patient was initially treated with hysterectomy, with surveillance labwork showing persistence of her malignancy. She then began combination chemotherapy, at the end of which she appeared to be in remission clinically. Unfortunately, subsequent imaging showed the persistence of pulmonary nodules that were ultimately resected, demonstrating a new primary lung adenocarcinoma. At present, she remains free of both cancers 2 years after her initial diagnosis. The complexity of this case underscores the importance of patient-centred treatment for rare tumours and the role of a multidisciplinary team in the effort to provide holistic care.

Background

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasias (GTNs) are rare placental tumours that arise from aberrant fertilisation events. Subtypes of GTNs include placental site trophoblastic tumours (PSTT), epithelioid trophoblastic tumours (ETT) and choriocarcinomas.1 2 These cancers are unique among human neoplasias as the majority are highly curable even in the presence of widely metastatic disease.3 However, distinguishing between subtypes is of critical importance in informing the therapeutic approach. Namely, choriocarcinomas have the greatest risk for early haematogenous dissemination, though these are also exquisitely sensitive to chemotherapy.3–5 PSTTs and ETTs, in contrast, typically present with uterine confined disease and are relatively chemoresistant, requiring surgical intervention.3 5 Mixed GTNs are defined by the presence of two or more histological subtypes; these are rarely encountered, and to date, only 34 cases have been published in the literature.6 7 We present the case of a woman diagnosed with a mixed GTN, with a predominant component of choriocarcinoma, which was diagnosed 14 years following her last pregnancy. We discuss the challenges in diagnosis and management, both initially and in the setting of disease progression and lung metastases. We also reflect on the dilemma faced by both the patient and medical team when residual lung nodules—ultimately identified as a synchronous primary lung adenocarcinoma—remained following completion of chemotherapy and resolution of her beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (b-hCG) levels. Altogether, we demonstrate the importance of multidisciplinary care and the necessity of patient engagement in the approach to an exceptionally rare diagnosis.

Case presentation

A 50-year-old G2P2002 woman came to medical attention when she acutely developed heavy vaginal bleeding with the passage of clots. Her medical history was significant only for depression and endometriosis. She had never used tobacco products and took no medications. Her first pregnancy had been complicated by premature rupture of membranes at 15 weeks, though she carried that child to term and had a spontaneous vaginal delivery; her second pregnancy was 14 years ago and was uncomplicated. She had had an intrauterine device (IUD) placed 5 years prior to presentation and had since been amenorrheic; it was not possible to say definitively whether the patient was in menopause.

On the patient’s initial presentation, her gynaecologist performed a pelvic ultrasound with IUD removal. The ultrasound demonstrated a 4.6×3.2 cm uterine mass extending from the mid-to-lower uterine segment, as well as a calcified uterine fibroid. The presence of a heterogeneously enhancing mass in the lower uterine segment was confirmed by CT of the abdomen and pelvis. The patient’s b-hCG was found to be significantly elevated at 3704 mIU/mL. The initial endometrial biopsy showed fragments of malignant cells in a background of blood and necrotic debris (figures 1–2). Neoplastic cells were polygonal with irregular hyperchromatic nuclei and ample eosinophilic cytoplasm. There was no normal endometrial or endocervical tissue present in the specimen, and immunohistochemistry studies were positive for cytokeratin 7 and hCG. These data were suggestive of a malignant GTN though a more precise diagnosis (choriocarcinoma vs PSTT vs ETT) could not be made at the time.

Figure 1

Endometrial biopsy pathology. High-grade trophoblastic neoplasm in a background of abundant blood and fibrin (H&E, ×100).

Figure 2

Endometrial biopsy pathology. High-power view demonstrates high-grade mitotically active cells, ranging from large, multinucleated cells to others with an epithelioid appearance (H&E, ×400).

Differential diagnosis

GTNs are a group of interrelated but histologically distinct, malignant lesions that arise from the abnormal growth of placental trophoblastic cells. Subtypes include choriocarcinomas, PSTT, ETT. As noted above, distinguishing between subtypes is of critical importance in informing the therapeutic approach, and pathology is critical to making a diagnosis.

Choriocarcinomas are traditionally hCG-producing epithelial tumours characterised histologically by tissue necrosis, a high degree of vascularity and the absence of chorionic villi.1–3 PSTTs, on the other hand, stain positive for human placental lactogen (hPL), with staining for hCG positive in only a few cells. ETTs are extremely rare and are characterised by a monomorphic cellular pattern of epithelioid cells.1 2 The latter two tend to grow more slowly relatively to choriocarcinomas and are less sensitive to chemotherapy. As such, even early-stage PSTTs and ETTs often require more aggressive management upfront (eg, surgery) whereas choriocarcinomas can be managed with chemotherapy alone.1–4

Given the uncertain aetiology of our patient’s tumour on initial endometrial biopsy (and inability to definitively rule out PSTT or ETT), the team opted to debulk surgically, both as a first step in treatment and to assist with definitive diagnosis. The patient underwent laparoscopic total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH-BSO) and excision of pelvic lymph nodes. Within this specimen, the tumour was noted to be 5.0×4.0×2.2 cm and occupied the anterior and posterior uterine walls. It had invaded the myometrium with a pushing border (figure 3). Extensive tumour necrosis was present though all pelvic lymph nodes were negative.

Figure 3

Hysterectomy specimen pathology. Frankly malignant tumour with myometrial invasion (H&E, ×40).

Further histological examination of the uterus proved quite challenging. On one hand, the extensive haemorrhage and necrosis, coupled with prominent spindling and pleomorphic nucleoli in the setting of diffuse and intense staining for hCG, were enough to characterise the cancer as a choriocarcinoma (figures 4–5). However, sections of the tumour also exhibited well-defined splitting and splaying of the smooth muscle bundles in the myometrium by trophoblasts that were more consistent with PSTT (figure 6). In addition, these sections were strongly immunopositive for hPL and mucin-4 (MUC-4), further substantiating this hypothesis. Finally, in a single section of the tumour, there was an area defined by trophoblastic cells in an epithelioid growth pattern, which stained diffusely for p63, highly suggestive of ETT. Ultimately, the medical team settled on a final diagnosis of a high-grade gestational trophoblastic tumour, largely with features of choriocarcinoma but with minor components of PSTT and ETT.

Figure 4

Hysterectomy specimen pathology. Trimorphic population of syncytiotrophoblasts, cytotrophoblasts and intermediate trophoblasts, characteristic of choriocarcinoma (H&E, ×200).

Figure 5

Hysterectomy specimen pathology. Spindled and pleomorphic tumour cells with easily identifiable mitotic figures (H&E, ×200).

Figure 6

Hysterectomy specimen pathology. Minor component of placental site trophoblastic tumour containing trophoblasts with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, which splay smooth muscle fibres as they invade the myometrium (H&E, ×200).

Initial outcome and follow-up

Following her TAH-BSO, the patient was followed closely with serial hCG levels. The patient’s hCG declined during postoperative recovery for 4 weeks. Unfortunately, it then began to plateau and, on postoperative day 39, rose from 67 IU/mL to 113 IU/mL, at which point the patient was restaged.

A CT chest showed numerous bilateral pulmonary nodules. The patient had had interval development of a 1.4 cm nodular opacity at the right lung base, a 1.2 cm prefissural nodular opacity in the left lower lobe and additional subcentimeter nodules in all lung fields. A brain MRI was performed that did not show evidence of central nervous system involvement. Additional PET imaging was not pursued given high concordance of PET scan results with CT imaging in patients with GTN.8 Based on the International Federation of Gynaecologic Oncology staging system and WHO Risk Scoring System for GTN, she was restaged as stage III: 11 disease.

Treatment

Given the progression of her disease and high-risk score, the patient was subsequently initiated on combination chemotherapy consisting of etoposide, methotrexate and actinomycin-D alternating every 2 weeks with cyclophosphamide and vincristine. She suffered greatly both physically and emotionally during treatment. Her most prominent side effect was nausea, which required prolonged hospital stays for hydration and resulted in severe depression, manifested by a near-complete withdrawal from her family. Indeed, it was only with significant support from her team psychologist and social worker that the patient completed six cycles of treatment and achieved normalisation of b-hCG levels.

Imaging is not routinely performed in a patient with GTN who has had a serological response to treatment. Rather, it is reserved for the end of therapy or if complications arise.9 However, given the mixed GTN, presence of pulmonary nodules and concern for a chemoresistant subtype, post-treatment CT imaging was pursued that showed only partial resolution of patient’s lung findings. Of greatest concern, we identified a 6 mm nodule in the right lower lobe that had remained stable. This was reviewed at a Multidisciplinary Gynaecologic Oncology Tumour Conference where there was a lack of consensus on next steps; some clinicians favoured surveillance with repeat imaging in 2–3 months (given the normalisation of her tumour markers); others favoured surgical resection of residual disease, given the concern for PSTT or ETT, which are both chemoresistant.

Faced with equipoise, the patient opted to proceed with right thoracoscopy and wedge resection of two segments within the right lower lobe, as well as a singular segment in the right upper lobe. Final pathology from the superior segment of the right lower lobe revealed a 9 mm invasive adenocarcinoma consistent with a primary lung adenocarcinoma (thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF1) positive, napsin A positive) with clear margins and no evidence of lymphovascular space invasion (figure 7). It did not resemble the trophoblastic tumour. The new primary was acinar predominant (45%), with papillary (40%), lepidic (10%) and micropapillary (5%) components. The patient was ultimately staged with pT1a lung cancer. Pathology from the remaining segments demonstrated parenchymal fibrosis with associated inflammatory cells that were favoured to represent treated tumour, with no evidence of malignant cells. After discussion with thoracic oncology and per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, no further surgical or adjuvant chemotherapy was recommended for the patient’s stage 1 lung adenocarcinoma, and she continued to undergo CT imaging biannually to monitor for disease recurrence.

Figure 7

Lung resection pathology. Right lower lobe superior segment demonstrating primary lung adenocarcinoma (H&E, ×100).

Final outcome and follow-up

Now 2 years postchemotherapy and surgery, the patient remains free of disease. Her hCG remains under 3 IU/mL and repeat chest CT as part of surveillance for her lung cancer has shown no evidence of relapse.

Discussion

This case summarises an unusual and exceedingly rare occurrence of a mixed GTN—largely consistent with choriocarcinoma though also with minor components of PSTT and ETT—further complicated by a primary lung adenocarcinoma.

Only 34 cases of mixed GTNs have been reported in the literature.6 7 This paucity of data limits our understanding of prognosis and management for such patients. In the largest series to date, 16 patients were identified from one institution. Half of these patients presented within 12 months of an antecedent pregnancy and all had a component of choriocarcinoma, with equal proportions having a component of PSTT or ETT. Unlike our patient, none were reported to have all three histologies identified on final pathology. All patients underwent surgery, and seven received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for presumed choriocarcinoma. Fifteen patients achieved a complete remission, though five experienced relapse within the first year.6

To our knowledge, our case is the first to document complete remission of a triple-lineage GTN in the setting of metastasis. We underscore the significance of a GTN approach that used upfront surgery, though eventually proved to be exquisitely sensitive to combination chemotherapy. Considering the concurrent lung primary that complicated this case, we stress the importance of obtaining a complete oncological workup in GTN and maintaining a broad differential, even in cases with high suspicion for metastatic disease.

We also highlight a unique approach to post-treatment surveillance of GTNs. Such cases do not typically require reimaging because serial b-hCG testing is considered sensitive for detecting recurrence.

Additionally, CT-detected pulmonary findings can persist following treatment without representing active disease. However, in our case, we tailored our approach to the patient and opted to proceed with imaging given her mixed histology, concerns for chemoresistance, and the complexity of her diagnostic course. The patient’s voice was essential in this critical choice that resulted in the diagnosis of a synchronous lung cancer, for which surgical resection was curative.

Finally, the physical and emotional strain of cancer treatment on an otherwise healthy patient must be emphasised. It can be difficult to tease apart the physical and emotional symptoms of depression from the side effects of chemotherapy or the symptoms of cancer itself. However, our case reminds clinicians that negative thoughts and cognitive distortions should always prompt consideration of depression and are not necessarily side effects of chemotherapy or cancer. As in this case, the assistance of social work and psychology in addressing the adverse impacts of depression can significantly alter the course of disease and allow patients to tolerate intensive treatment.

In conclusion, we present a rare case of mixed GTN and synchronous lung cancer. We emphasise the importance of tailored, patient-centred treatment approaches for rare tumours. We also highlight the importance of patient engagement and the role of a multidisciplinary team in the effort to provide holistic care.

Patient’s perspective

I still remember having the initial ultrasound. My gynaecologist had initially said that she did not think there was anything to worry about, though she wanted to do the test ‘just in case’. Because it was performed in an obstetrician’s office, the screen was oriented so that I could see the image (presumably so that women undergoing the test for pregnancy could see their baby), and I was able to watch and see all of the labels. I also knew enough about reading ultrasounds to do a little interpretation. So, when the technician started measuring and labelling something with an ‘M’ (presumably, ‘mass’), I immediately started to worry. When she finished, she left the room and said ‘good luck.’ She probably said it to everyone, but it made my heart sink.

I also remember the phone call from my gynaecologist when she told me it was cancer. I am a schoolteacher and was at work at the time. It felt like the whole framework of my world shifted. I remember my mother crying when I told her. I remember how she and my father (a stiff-upper-lipped Englishman who rarely shows emotion) held me and cried. I also remember the look of fear in my children’s faces and remember being very confused about exactly what kind of cancer I had. The tumour was rare, I was told, and they couldn’t settle on the diagnosis. It seemed, at first, that my physicians were fairly confident that the surgery had provided successful treatment. I remember telling my colleagues at work that I would be back in a few weeks. Instead, I found myself having more imaging and much more extensive treatment.

Chemotherapy ended up being so very brutal. I experienced profound and continuous nausea, and I lost at least 10 pounds. Even more debilitating, the treatment had a negative impact on my mood and my energy levels. I am usually busy with many interests—reading, drawing, crafts, music, riding—but I had so little energy and lost interest in a lot of those things. A part of that was simply that the fatigue from chemotherapy was so intense, but to be honest, treatment was even causing me to feel guilty. I felt I was becoming a burden on my family, especially given what this was doing to my kids.

At that point, I reached out to social work—trying to be a supportive and present mother to my two teenage daughters was proving to be a huge challenge. As just one example, it was my older daughter’s senior year of high school and I was unable to support her with college application activities. At the accepted students’ weekend for her college I spent half the time sleeping, unable to participate in the scheduled activities. I remember that one of my worries (so minor in the big picture, but so real to a parent of a teenager) was what to do with my hair for her graduation—would I have any? Wear a scarf? A wig? What would be best for her?

I remember how completely unfair it felt when I discovered that I had lung cancer too. Just totally unfair. (Dang it! I have never smoked—not even once to ‘try it out’). I thought I’d only have to worry about the gynaecologic tumour but I am actually more frightened after being diagnosed with the lung cancer. Despite its rarity, the GTN was quite responsive to treatment whereas it seems that lung cancer is far more lethal. It leaves me very nervous about whether it is all gone or what else might happen. I think there is an illogical but quite human feeling that having had one cancer should be enough.

Learning points

  • Mixed metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasias can be successfully treated with combination chemotherapy and surgery, even in the presence of a second primary malignancy.

  • It is always important to obtain a complete oncological workup and to maintain a broad differential even in cases with high suspicion for metastatic disease given the possibilty of a second primary process.

  • Interdisciplinary conversations between oncologists, pathologists, surgeons, psychiatrists and social workers are critical in providing holistic care for patients.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge a number of individuals who contributed to this work: Drs Don Dizon and Tarra Evans, who served as advisors and cared for the patient described in this report. Ms. Susan Garland and Dr Emily Rowland, who critically reviewed the report. Dr Jesse Hart, who was instrumental in analysing the pathology described in this report.

Footnotes

  • Contributors VI designed the report, conducted the literature review and drafted the manuscript. HM contributed and provided feedback on the manuscript; she may be considered a co-first author. CH is the patient described and contributed her perspective to the report. AS conceived of the case report, contributed to its drafting, and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer